N-(2,3-dimethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofuro[2,3-b]quinolin-4-yl)-2-(2-oxopyrrolidin-1-yl)acetamide (MKC-231), supplied as a dry crystalline solid for chromatographic identity, purity and method-development work. Laboratory reagent and analytical reference material only — not for human or animal consumption, not a medicinal product, food or supplement.
Every unit ships with a batch Certificate of Analysis stating assay, water content, related substances and residual solvents. Full registry data, computed descriptors, the published MKC-231 pharmacology, regulatory position and 16 cited sources are set out below.
Product classification — read before ordering. This item is a chemical reagent and analytical reference material. It is not a medicinal product, dietary supplement, food, feed, novel food or cosmetic, and it is not intended for human or animal consumption or for any in-vivo administration whatsoever. It is supplied exclusively to laboratories, research institutions and professional users for in-vitro analytical, chromatographic and method-development work. Scientific findings summarised on this page describe substances investigated in published laboratory research; they are reported here as bibliographic facts about that literature and are not product claims, dosage guidance, or a recommendation of any use of this reagent.
Coluracetam is the international nonproprietary name for N-(2,3-dimethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofuro[2,3-b]quinolin-4-yl)-2-(2-oxopyrrolidin-1-yl)acetamide [1]. The name places it in the racetam family, and the 2-oxopyrrolidin-1-yl-acetamide fragment on the right of the molecule is indeed the shared racetam motif. Everything to the left of it is not: a tricyclic furo[2,3-b]quinoline with a saturated carbocyclic ring, which no other member of the family carries. That asymmetry between the name and the structure is the single most useful thing to understand about this compound, and section 12 explains why.
Every identifier below comes from a public authoritative registry [1][2], so a receiving laboratory can reconcile the material against its own inventory system without ambiguity.
None at the level of the substance. MKC-231 is the development code from the original Mitsubishi programme and is the designation used in essentially the whole primary pharmacological literature [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Coluracetam is the later INN. A literature search on the INN alone will miss almost everything published about the compound; searching on the code is what finds it. Note also that the code is written with a hyphen — searching MKC231 without one returns nothing in PubChem.
| INN | coluracetam |
|---|---|
| IUPAC name | N-(2,3-dimethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofuro[2,3-b]quinolin-4-yl)-2-(2-oxopyrrolidin-1-yl)acetamide |
| Development code | MKC-231 |
| CAS Registry Number | 135463-81-9 |
| UNII (FDA GSRS) | V6FL6O5GR7 |
| PubChem CID | 214346 |
| ChEMBL ID | CHEMBL37935 |
| DrugBank ID | DB21278 |
| DSSTox Substance ID | DTXSID60159386 |
| NCI Thesaurus code | C77391 |
| Nikkaji Number | J609.493G |
| MDL Number | MFCD00901416 |
| Wikidata | Q3683872 |
| Molecular formula | C19H23N3O3 |
| Average molecular mass | 341.4 g·mol−1 |
| Monoisotopic mass | 341.17394 Da |
| InChIKey | PSPGQHXMUKWNDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
| InChI | InChI=1S/C19H23N3O3/c1-11-12(2)25-19-17(11)18(13-6-3-4-7-14(13)20-19)21-15(23)10-22-9-5-8-16(22)24/h3-10H2,1-2H3,(H,20,21,23) |
| SMILES | CC1=C(OC2=NC3=C(CCCC3)C(=C12)NC(=O)CN4CCCC4=O)C |
Identifiers that do not exist for this substance, and what that tells you. Coluracetam has no EC number, no ChEBI entry, no KEGG identifier, no HMDB entry and no ATC code [1]. Those absences are not clerical. No EC number means the substance has never entered the European chemicals inventory, which in turn means there is no REACH dossier and no route by which a harmonised hazard classification could have been produced — see section 10. No ATC code means it has never been an authorised medicine anywhere. A laboratory reconciling this material against a corporate substance database should expect those fields to stay empty rather than treat them as missing data to be filled.
Three regions govern its behaviour in the laboratory.
The furo[2,3-b]quinoline core is a flat, fused, electron-rich heteroaromatic system carrying two methyl groups on the furan ring. It supplies almost all of the molecule's ultraviolet absorbance and almost all of its bulk: at complexity 540 it is by a wide margin the most structurally intricate compound in this catalogue [1]. It is also the reason coluracetam is retained far more strongly on reversed-phase columns than the small polar racetams it is nominally grouped with.
The saturated carbocyclic ring fused at positions 5 to 8 removes aromaticity from one third of the tricycle. That matters for photostability and for the fragmentation pattern, since a saturated ring fragments differently from an aromatic one.
The 2-oxopyrrolidin-1-yl acetamide arm is the racetam motif, and it is the only part of the molecule shared with piracetam, aniracetam or oxiracetam. It carries the single hydrogen-bond donor — the anilide NH — and two of the four acceptors.
The comparison that teaches the most is with oxiracetam, a small, strongly polar racetam of computed logP around −2.2 and molecular mass 158. Coluracetam shares its terminal fragment and almost nothing else: nearly 2.2 times the mass, and a computed logP more than four and a half log units higher. Any method built for one will fail on the other, which makes the pair a useful bracket when qualifying a gradient. Aniracetam and noopept sit between them.
Everything in this section is computed. There is no experimental physicochemistry for this substance. The PubChem record for coluracetam contains no Experimental Properties section at all — no measured melting point, boiling point, density, refractive index, solubility or partition coefficient [1]. Figures for these constants circulate in commercial listings; they are not traceable to any named measurement and none is reproduced here.
| XLogP3-AA | 2.4 |
|---|---|
| Topological polar surface area | 75.4 Å2 |
| Hydrogen-bond donors | 1 |
| Hydrogen-bond acceptors | 4 |
| Rotatable bonds | 3 |
| Heavy atoms | 25 |
| Formal charge | 0 |
| Complexity (Cactvs) | 540 |
| Defined / undefined atom stereocentres | 0 / 0 |
| Defined / undefined bond stereocentres | 0 / 0 |
A computed logP of 2.4 with a polar surface area of 75.4 Å2 describes a moderately lipophilic, well-behaved reversed-phase analyte. Expect comfortable retention on C18 with a mid-range organic mobile phase — neither the excessive retention of a strongly lipophilic solid nor the void-volume elution of a polar racetam.
The extended heteroaromatic system is the practical gift. A fused, electron-rich tricycle absorbs strongly in the ultraviolet, so diode-array detection should give good sensitivity and a distinctive spectrum for library matching. For a compound with no deposited ultraviolet spectrum (section 7), acquiring one against an authentic standard is both easy and worth doing.
Only three rotatable bonds for twenty-five heavy atoms means an unusually rigid molecule. Rigid analytes give narrow, symmetrical peaks and reproducible retention, and are less prone to temperature-dependent peak distortion.
No ionisable centre of consequence. The quinoline nitrogen is part of a fused, electron-delocalised system and the anilide NH is not acidic in any usable range; mobile-phase pH is therefore a weak lever on retention. That removes a common source of inter-laboratory drift but also removes a tool for adjusting selectivity, so stationary-phase choice does the work.
Coluracetam has no stereocentre. The registry record reports zero defined and zero undefined atom stereocentres, and zero of each for bond stereocentres [1]; the standard InChIKey ends in UHFFFAOYSA, the marker for a structure carrying no stereochemical layer at all.
This section exists because the claim that this substance is a "dextrorotatory stereoisomer" circulates widely in commercial listings. It is not a matter of interpretation. A molecule with no stereogenic atom and no stereogenic bond has no enantiomers, cannot be dextrorotatory or laevorotatory, and cannot exist as a resolved isomer. Every carbon in the tricycle is either aromatic, or a methylene with two hydrogens, or a ring-fusion carbon whose substituents are fixed by the ring system.
What this means for the analyst. There is no enantiomeric impurity to specify, no chiral method to validate, and no enantiomeric ratio to report on the Certificate of Analysis. A single achiral HPLC or LC-MS method characterises this material completely, and a chiral column will give one peak. Conversely, this article cannot be used to qualify a chiral separation — for that a racemate with a genuine stereocentre is needed, such as the racemic modafinil standard, which is chiral at sulfur.
It also means that any supplier datasheet describing coluracetam as an isolated optical isomer has not been checked against the structure, and its other figures deserve the same scepticism.
No solid-state data are published for this substance. No crystal structure, no polymorph screen, no melting point, no density and no solubility figure appear in the authoritative registries [1]. This page asserts no crystal form and prints no melting point. Where either matters to a procedure, determine it for the batch — and note that doing so would generate data that does not currently exist in the public record for this compound.
What can be said follows from structure. Coluracetam is a neutral, rigid, moderately lipophilic crystalline solid with a single hydrogen-bond donor and a large flat aromatic surface. Flat fused aromatics of this kind tend to pack efficiently and are not usually hygroscopic; there is no ionisable group to complicate handling. Methanol, acetonitrile, acetone and dimethyl sulfoxide are the rational solvents for chromatographic stock solutions. Water is not usable at practically relevant concentrations.
Because no certified solubility figure exists, determine the working concentration gravimetrically for the specific batch rather than inheriting one: weigh, dissolve, confirm complete dissolution, verify against a ultraviolet or mass-spectrometric response, and record the result. For this compound that record has more value than usual, because there is nothing published to compare it with.
Most reference standards exist because a well-studied substance needs routine confirmation. Coluracetam is the opposite case, and it is worth stating plainly because it is the whole argument for stocking it.
The substance is consumed, and it cannot be measured. On the demand side, coluracetam appears as a labelled ingredient in products sold as dietary supplements, and the United States Drug Enforcement Administration has recorded it in the National Forensic Laboratory Information System under the category New Drug since December 2023 [5] — an entry that exists only because forensic laboratories were submitting samples containing it. On the supply side, the published analytical literature for this compound is close to empty: no validated HPLC method, no LC-MS/MS assay, no impurity profile, no crystal structure and no published synthesis could be located for coluracetam specifically.
A measurement of that asymmetry. A bibliographic search of Crossref returns on the order of a single record for "coluracetam" against 863 for piracetam, 165 for aniracetam and 120 for nefiracetam — the same query run identically across the family. Coluracetam is the member of this class for which the analytical toolbox has essentially never been built. (The count for the development code MKC-231 is not usable as a comparison, because the hyphen tokenises and returns hundreds of thousands of unrelated records; it is quoted here only to explain why it is excluded.)
The practical consequence: a laboratory that needs to quantify coluracetam has nothing to start from except an authenticated standard and its own instrument. That is not a marketing claim, it is the state of the literature.
Three properties make this compound easier to work with than its literature suggests:
What has to be established from the standard itself: retention time and relative retention on the laboratory's own column, the ultraviolet spectrum, the product-ion transitions and their ratios, the response factor, the limit of detection actually achieved in the relevant matrix, and the impurity profile of authentic material against which a sample can be judged.
The name is misleading and the structure is the reason. Coluracetam shares only the terminal 2-oxopyrrolidin-1-yl acetamide fragment with the classical racetams; the rest of the molecule has no counterpart in the family [14][15].
| Property | Coluracetam | Oxiracetam | Aniracetam | Piracetam |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular mass | 341.4 | 158.2 | 219.2 | 142.2 |
| Computed logP | 2.4 | −2.2 | 1.0 | −1.5 |
| Core beyond the racetam motif | furo[2,3-b]quinoline tricycle | none | anisoyl | none |
| Stereocentre | none | one (racemic) | none | none |
| Reported mechanism | HACU enhancer [13] | not established as a single target for the class [14][15] | ||
| Analytical literature | essentially none | substantial | substantial | very large |
| In this catalogue | this page | oxiracetam | aniracetam | — |
The row that matters operationally is logP. A gradient that elutes oxiracetam near the void will retain coluracetam strongly; a method built for coluracetam will not see oxiracetam at all. Grouping these substances under one catalogue heading does not make them one chromatographic problem, and a laboratory qualifying a multi-analyte racetam method needs both extremes present to prove it.
Because coluracetam is present in products on sale and absent from the analytical literature, the laboratories most likely to need this material are those screening consumer products for declared or undeclared ingredients. Identification in such work requires an authenticated standard for each substance claimed, and for this compound no pharmacopoeial or certified alternative exists.
Third-party spectra deposited against the compound record are listed below with attribution. They are the property of the depositors named and are cited so that a laboratory can locate an independent comparison. They are not the spectra of the batch supplied.
| Technique | Depositor and attribution | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ATR-IR | Forensic Spectral Research; sample supplied by Cayman Chemical Company, catalogue number 26032, lot 0645363-2. Instrument Bio-Rad FTS. Copyright John Wiley & Sons, Inc. | The only deposited spectrum with provenance down to lot number |
| FT-Raman | Same sample and provenance. Copyright John Wiley & Sons, Inc. | Complementary vibrational technique |
| GC-MS | DigiLab GmbH; copyright DigiLab GmbH and Wiley-VCH GmbH | Electron-ionisation reference spectrum |
The absences are the point of this section. There is no deposited 1H NMR, no 13C NMR, no ultraviolet–visible spectrum and no LC-MS/MS spectrum for coluracetam [1]. For a compound whose dominant analytical need is a liquid-chromatographic method with mass-spectrometric or ultraviolet detection, the two spectra that would help most are precisely the two that do not exist. A laboratory building such a method has nothing to calibrate against except material it holds itself.
That gap is the strongest practical reason to keep an authenticated standard on the shelf for this substance rather than to rely on a library.
| Parameter | Method | Specification |
|---|---|---|
| Identity — chromatographic | HPLC, retention against reference | Conforms |
| Identity — spectroscopic | IR and/or MS against reference spectrum | Conforms |
| Assay | HPLC, area normalisation | ≥99% |
| Related substances | HPLC, area normalisation | Batch value reported |
| Residual solvents | GC headspace | Batch value reported |
| Water content | Karl Fischer titration | Batch value reported |
| Appearance | Visual | Crystalline powder |
| Enantiomeric purity | — | Not applicable — the substance is achiral (section 4) |
| Melting range | — | No registry value exists for comparison (section 5) |
The layout of the certificate and the method stated against each parameter can be reviewed on the specimen Certificate of Analysis.
Scope of the specification. This is an analytical reference standard with a batch Certificate of Analysis. It is not a certified reference material in the ISO 17034 sense and not a pharmacopoeial reference standard. For coluracetam no certified or pharmacopoeial alternative is known to exist, so where a scheme requires one, that requirement cannot currently be met from any source.
There is no hazard classification for coluracetam. The compound record contains no Safety and Hazards section and no notifications to the ECHA Classification and Labelling Inventory [1]. No signal word, no hazard statements, no hazard classes and no precautionary statements have been assigned by anyone, and this page therefore prints no pictogram and no H- or P-phrase. Doing so would mean inventing a regulatory determination that does not exist.
The absence has a traceable cause rather than being an oversight: coluracetam has no EC number (section 1), so it has never entered the European chemicals inventory, and without that entry there is no REACH registration and no mechanism by which a classification would have been generated.
An absent classification is not a safety claim. It records that nobody has classified the substance. It must not be read as evidence that the material is harmless, and it must not be used to justify lighter handling.
In the absence of any classification the defensible approach is to treat coluracetam as a biologically active organic solid of unknown hazard: gloves, eye protection, containment of dust under local exhaust, no eating or drinking in the handling area, and a workplace risk assessment that records the absence of data as a finding in its own right. The Safety Data Sheet shipped with the batch is the controlling document.
Coluracetam was developed in Japan under the code MKC-231 in a programme at Mitsubishi, and the whole of its primary pharmacological literature carries that designation. The compound was designed around a specific and unusual pharmacological hypothesis — enhancement of high-affinity choline uptake — rather than around structural analogy to piracetam, which is why its structure departs so far from the rest of the family it is named after.
The literature falls into three clear phases. The first, in the mid-1990s, established the behavioural effect: Murai and colleagues reported in 1994 that MKC-231 ameliorated working-memory deficits and decreased hippocampal acetylcholine in rats treated with the cholinergic neurotoxin AF64A [6], and Bessho and colleagues reported effects on water-maze learning deficits in 1996 [7].
The second, at the turn of the century, probed the boundaries: Akaike and colleagues examined a protective effect against glutamate cytotoxicity in cultured cortical neurons [8], and Uemura and colleagues reported central hyperglycaemic effects [9].
The third and most informative is a coordinated three-part series published together in the Journal of Neural Transmission in 2008, which set out to establish the mechanism directly [11][12][13]. Between the second and third phases, Shirayama and colleagues examined the compound against phencyclidine-induced behavioural deficits [10].
Development did not continue to an authorised medicine in any jurisdiction. What followed instead was appearance on the consumer market, and the regulatory footprint described in section 14 — a forensic reporting entry rather than an approval.
How to read this section. What follows summarises published laboratory research on the substance coluracetam (MKC-231), reported as bibliographic fact and attributed to the experimental system that produced it. None of it describes, predicts or claims any effect of the reagent supplied on this page, which is not administered to anything. Nothing here is dosage guidance, a health claim, or a representation that the substance is safe or effective for any purpose.
Coluracetam is one of the few compounds in this catalogue for which a specific proposed mechanism exists in the primary literature, and it is not the mechanism its family name suggests.
The proposal is enhancement of high-affinity choline uptake (HACU), the rate-limiting step in acetylcholine synthesis at cholinergic nerve terminals. The 2008 three-part series in the Journal of Neural Transmission examined it systematically in rats treated with AF64A, a neurotoxin that selectively damages cholinergic terminals. Part 1 reported long-lasting cognitive improvement after repeated administration [11]; part 2 examined effects on the synthesis and release of acetylcholine [12]; part 3 addressed the mode of action of the enhancement of high-affinity choline uptake itself [13].
That the third paper exists at all is what distinguishes this compound. Most of the substances catalogued as racetams have no established single target — a point made in the standard reviews of the class [14][15]. Coluracetam has a named, specific, mechanistically framed hypothesis with a dedicated study behind it.
What that literature does and does not establish. Four limitations apply. First, essentially all of it comes from one research group working within a single development programme, and the 2008 series shares authors with the 1996 work [7][11][12][13]. Second, the central model is AF64A-lesioned rats — a chemically induced cholinergic lesion, not a naturally occurring disease state. Third, no independent replication outside the originating programme was located. Fourth, the work is now between seventeen and thirty years old and has no modern follow-up.
The honest summary is that coluracetam has a well-specified mechanistic hypothesis with narrow supporting evidence, which is a different thing from an established mechanism.
No clinical literature for coluracetam was located. No published controlled clinical trial of this substance was found, it holds no marketing authorisation in any jurisdiction, and no medicines regulator has assessed it for safety or efficacy.
An unresolved discrepancy, reported rather than smoothed over. One aggregating database annotates coluracetam with a development-phase indicator suggesting a phase-2 clinical programme, while a direct query of the public clinical-trials registry returns no registered trials for the substance — a query that returns hundreds for modafinil when run identically, so the search itself is known to work. The two sources disagree and this page cannot resolve which is right from the public record. It therefore asserts neither that clinical trials were conducted nor that they were not. Anyone relying on this point should check the primary registry themselves.
What can be said without qualification is that the substance is not, and has never been, an authorised medicine, and that nothing on this page offers it as one.
| Instrument / jurisdiction | Status |
|---|---|
| WADA Prohibited List 2026 | Not listed. Coluracetam does not appear on the 2026 Prohibited List. Of the racetam family, only fonturacetam (4-phenylpiracetam, carphedon) is named, in class S6.A; piracetam itself is not listed [3] |
| Poland — narcotics, psychotropics and new psychoactive substances | Not listed. Coluracetam does not appear in Annexes 1, 2 or 3 of the consolidated regulation, Dz.U. 2024 poz. 1139; no racetam appears there [4] |
| Poland — medicinal products | Not registered. A search of the national Register of Medicinal Products returns no coluracetam product |
| European Union | No marketing authorisation. No ATC code has ever been assigned [1] |
| EU — chemicals inventory | No EC number and no REACH registration, hence no classification of any kind (section 10) [1] |
| United States | Not a controlled substance. Recorded in the DEA National Forensic Laboratory Information System under category New Drug, added December 2023 [5]. See the note below on what that does and does not mean |
| Other jurisdictions | Not assessed. Status must be verified locally before import, purchase or possession |
What the NFLIS entry means, and what it does not. The National Forensic Laboratory Information System is a reporting programme that collects results from forensic laboratories analysing seized or submitted drug evidence. A category assignment records how such results are tabulated. It is not a scheduling action under the Controlled Substances Act and does not by itself make a substance controlled in the United States. It is reported here for two reasons: because it is a factual annotation in the registry record, and because the date it carries — December 2023 — is direct evidence that samples containing this substance were reaching forensic laboratories, which is part of the case for a reference standard made in section 6.1.
Research use only. Not for human or animal consumption.
By placing an order the purchaser confirms acceptance of these conditions and confirms the material will be used exclusively as described above.
| Document scope | Technical and regulatory description of coluracetam supplied as an analytical reference material |
|---|---|
| Last reviewed | 22 August 2026 |
| Primary data sources | PubChem (NCBI) compound record CID 214346; FDA GSRS (UNII); WADA International Standard — Prohibited List 2026; Polish Ministry of Health consolidated regulation Dz.U. 2024 poz. 1139; DEA NFLIS annotation |
| Bibliographic verification | Every cited work was checked against PubMed and Crossref metadata. Each DOI was resolved and its registered title, journal, volume, issue and pagination confirmed against the citation printed here. One cited work has no DOI and is referenced by PubMed identifier instead. Where a Crossref record listed author given and family names in transposed order, the correct form was taken from the publication itself |
| Regulatory verification | Each negative regulatory finding was confirmed with a paired positive control: the WADA and Polish documents were retrieved and searched, and substances known to be listed in each were confirmed present in the same search before the absence of coluracetam was recorded, so that a failed search could not be mistaken for a negative result |
| Rule on numerical values | No physical constant is printed unless it appears in a named authoritative registry or is measured for the delivered batch. For this substance the registries contain no experimental constants at all, so none is printed |
| Rule on biological claims | Findings from the pharmacological literature are attributed to the experimental system that produced them. No finding is transferred to this reagent article, and no effect in humans is claimed for it |
| Corrections | The molecular mass, the claim of optical activity and the density figure previously shown on this page were wrong and were removed against the registry record on 22 August 2026. Documented errors are corrected and the review date updated |
This page does not currently carry a named author with stated professional qualifications, a named technical reviewer, or laboratory data generated in-house for a specific batch — no chromatogram, no spectrum, no measured retention or melting data of our own. For a substance with this little public data those gaps matter more than usual: in-house measurements here would be additions to the public record, not merely confirmations of it.
Citations follow the Chicago author–date convention. All external links carry rel="nofollow". Access to full texts is governed by the policies of the respective publishers.